PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSD vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSD vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSD achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.


EVSD

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.98%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PIT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
27.31%
6M
26.74%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSD vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVSD
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
0.80%6.80%3.86%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
27.31%21.63%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSD and PIT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSD vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSD
EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSD vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVSDPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.32

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.74

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.80

10.88

+3.92

EVSD vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSD and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVSD vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSD drawdown since its inception was -1.26%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSD and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSDPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-14.05%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-14.05%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-14.05%

+13.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-4.07%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

3.59%

-3.29%

Volatility

EVSD vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) is 0.54%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that EVSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSDPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

4.67%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.22%

19.36%

-18.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57%

21.66%

-20.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.95%

17.50%

-15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.95%

17.50%

-15.55%

EVSD vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVSD vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

EVSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVSD
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
4.62%4.64%2.91%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
7.00%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVSD and PIT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to EVSD (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSD dropped -1.26% vs PIT's -14.05%.

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 38.33% vs 4.46% for EVSD. On fees, EVSD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EVSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 38.33% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVSD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 4.62% for EVSD.

EVSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EVSD and 0.55% for PIT.

EVSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSD and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer