PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVSB vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVSB vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVSB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 1.89% return.


EVSB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.73%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.47%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVSB vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.73%5.12%6.04%1.84%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.89%5.16%7.43%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EVSB and JAAA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVSB vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVSB
EVSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EVSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVSB vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVSBJAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

2.71

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.53

13.18

+5.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

108.58

70.92

+37.66

EVSB vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVSB Sharpe Ratio is 6.10, which is comparable to the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVSB and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVSBJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

6.04

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.97

2.78

+4.19

Drawdowns

EVSB vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVSB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum JAAA drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVSB and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVSBJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-2.64%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.39%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.25%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.07%

-0.03%

Volatility

EVSB vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF (EVSB) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that EVSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVSBJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.13%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

0.64%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78%

0.85%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

1.68%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.82%

1.64%

-0.82%

EVSB vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVSB vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

EVSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EVSB
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.62%4.63%5.18%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVSB and JAAA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVSB has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVSB dropped -0.31% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

On 1-year performance, JAAA leads with 5.10% vs 4.69% for EVSB. On fees, EVSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 5.10% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JAAA.

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.62% for EVSB.

EVSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for EVSB and 0.20% for JAAA.

EVSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 6.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVSB and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer