EVMT vs. ZSC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and ZSC (USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVMT returned 41.86% vs 36.39% for ZSC. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

EVMT vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than ZSC's 9.47% return.

EVMT

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 22.53%
• 1Y: 41.86%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZSC

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 36.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	13.45%	30.61%	-10.50%	-12.07%
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund	9.47%	28.43%	-14.39%	-10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and ZSC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023	0.38

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 85
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ZSC

ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 84
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVMT	ZSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.88	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.73	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.54	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	4.76	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.86	14.69	+3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVMT vs. ZSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ZSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and ZSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVMT	ZSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.88	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	0.22	-0.48

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than ZSC's maximum drawdown of -26.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and ZSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	ZSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-26.49%	-21.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	-7.69%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.69%	-2.71%	-18.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-14.74%	-20.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.48%	-0.13%

Volatility

EVMT vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) at 3.19%. This indicates that EVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	ZSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	3.19%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.47%	9.09%	+4.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	12.70%	+2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	12.24%	+8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	12.24%	+8.27%

EVMT vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EVMT and ZSC have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

EVMT vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than ZSC's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.40%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund	1.60%	1.75%	2.18%	1.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and ZSC in my portfolio?

EVMT and ZSC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or ZSC?

EVMT has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to ZSC (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs ZSC's -26.49%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or ZSC?

On 1-year performance, EVMT leads with 41.86% vs 36.39% for ZSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, ZSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or ZSC?

Over the 1-year period, EVMT has performed better with a 41.86% return vs 36.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or ZSC?

EVMT and ZSC have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or ZSC?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 1.60% for ZSC.

What is the main difference between EVMT and ZSC?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and USCF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.