EVMT vs. VUSV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.

Performance

EVMT vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than VUSV's 7.46% return.

EVMT

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 22.53%
• 1Y: 41.86%
• 3Y*: 4.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUSV

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	13.45%	11.83%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	7.46%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and VUSV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 85
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVMT	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVMT	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.26	2.23	-2.50

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and VUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	VUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-7.06%	-41.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.69%	-0.52%	-21.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-1.31%	-33.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	VUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.09%	11.94%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	11.94%	+8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	11.94%	+8.57%

EVMT vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.40%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and VUSV in my portfolio?

EVMT and VUSV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or VUSV?

On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or VUSV?

VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or VUSV?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between EVMT and VUSV?

EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.30% for VUSV.