EVMT vs. SGOV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. EVMT is actively managed, while SGOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EVMT returned 5.30%/yr vs 4.72%/yr for SGOV. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.

Performance

EVMT vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.51% return.

EVMT

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.44%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 6M: 26.50%
• 1Y: 43.92%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGOV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 3.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	15.36%	30.61%	-10.50%	-27.71%	-16.95%
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF	1.51%	4.24%	5.27%	5.12%	1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and SGOV is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	-0.02

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 87
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SGOV

SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVMT	SGOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	20.28	-17.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	275.69	-271.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	195.55	-194.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.61	398.20	-392.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.04	4,462.00	-4,442.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVMT vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVMT	SGOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	20.28	-17.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	14.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	12.48	-12.73

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and SGOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	SGOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-0.03%	-48.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.96%	-0.01%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	-0.01%	-29.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.36%	0.00%	-20.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.75%	-0.00%	-34.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	0.00%	+2.35%

Volatility

EVMT vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that EVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	SGOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	0.05%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	0.13%	+13.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.99%	0.20%	+14.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	0.24%	+20.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	0.24%	+20.27%

EVMT vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than SGOV's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	10.23%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF	3.86%	4.10%	5.10%	4.87%	1.45%	0.03%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and SGOV in my portfolio?

EVMT and SGOV have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or SGOV?

EVMT has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or SGOV?

On 3-year performance, EVMT leads with 5.30% vs 4.72% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or SGOV?

Over the 3-year period, EVMT has performed better with a 5.30% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or SGOV?

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or SGOV?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.23%, compared with 3.86% for SGOV.

What is the main difference between EVMT and SGOV?

EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.09% for SGOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.