EVMO vs. KMLM
EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) and KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMO is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while KMLM is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. EVMO is actively managed, while KMLM is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. EVMO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for KMLM.
Performance
EVMO vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVMO achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 8.29% return.
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 9.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
EVMO vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.93% | 3.37% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVMO and KMLM is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVMO vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
EVMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMLM
EVMO vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVMO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVMO vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVMO drawdown since its inception was -1.89%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMO and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVMO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -27.47% | +25.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -15.57% | +14.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -12.79% | +12.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility
EVMO vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVMO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 11.37% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 14.55% | -11.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 14.67% | -11.78% |
EVMO vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVMO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVMO vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
EVMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than KMLM's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.52% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.64% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVMO and KMLM have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVMO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVMO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.
KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 4.52% for EVMO.
EVMO is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while KMLM is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EVMO and 0.90% for KMLM.
Find the right allocation for EVMO and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer