PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLN vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVLN vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVLN vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
-0.98%5.59%7.29%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
0.93%4.23%4.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 0.93% return.


EVLN

1D
0.16%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
0.33%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.93%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVLN vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EVLN vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLN vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLNUSFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

14.37

-12.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

42.77

-40.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

10.64

-9.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

103.73

-101.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.31

661.88

-654.57

EVLN vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLN and USFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLNUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

14.37

-12.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

3.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.28

1.57

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between EVLN and USFR is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EVLN vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than USFR's 4.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
7.19%7.28%6.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
4.00%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%

Drawdowns

EVLN vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and USFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLNUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-1.36%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.05%

-0.04%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

0.00%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.16%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.01%

+0.59%

Volatility

EVLN vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that EVLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVLNUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.09%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.19%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

0.29%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

0.41%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

0.81%

+1.62%