PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLN vs. EVYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVLN vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than EVYM's 3.30% return.


EVLN

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.73%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVYM

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.30%
6M
3.97%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLN vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVLN and EVYM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVLN vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLN vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLNEVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

2.87

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.39

4.44

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.60

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.81

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.01

14.44

-5.43

EVLN vs. EVYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the EVYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLN and EVYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLNEVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.87

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.55

0.93

+1.63

Drawdowns

EVLN vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum EVYM drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and EVYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLNEVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-6.08%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-2.77%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.15%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-1.49%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.73%

-0.19%

Volatility

EVLN vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) is 0.46%, while Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that EVLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVLNEVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.94%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

2.59%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

3.69%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

6.08%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.43%

6.08%

-3.65%

EVLN vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVLN vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison

EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than EVYM's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.92%7.28%6.41%
EVYM
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF
4.78%3.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVLN and EVYM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVYM has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to EVLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLN dropped -2.78% vs EVYM's -6.08%.

On 1-year performance, EVYM leads with 10.52% vs 4.86% for EVLN. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVYM has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.78% for EVYM.

EVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while EVYM is High Yield Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EVLN and 0.40% for EVYM.

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVLN and EVYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer