EVLN vs. EVSM
EVLN (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF) and EVSM (Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while EVSM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA 1-3 Year Municipal Securities Index. EVLN is actively managed, while EVSM is passively managed. Over the past year, EVLN returned 4.86% vs 4.06% for EVSM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVLN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EVSM.
Performance
EVLN vs. EVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVLN achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than EVSM's 1.15% return.
EVLN
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVSM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVLN vs. EVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 1.37% | 5.59% | 6.27% |
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.15% | 4.24% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVLN and EVSM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVLN vs. EVSM — Risk / Return Rank
EVLN
EVSM
EVLN vs. EVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVLN | EVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.70 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.79 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 13.52 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVLN | EVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 3.23 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 1.89 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
EVLN vs. EVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, which is greater than EVSM's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLN and EVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVLN | EVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -1.50% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.77% | -1.07% | -0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.06% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.24% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.30% | +0.24% |
Volatility
EVLN vs. EVSM - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) at 0.33%. This indicates that EVLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVLN | EVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.33% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 0.83% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89% | 1.27% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 1.92% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 1.92% | +0.51% |
EVLN vs. EVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EVSM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVLN vs. EVSM - Dividend Comparison
EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than EVSM's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EVLN Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF | 6.92% | 7.28% | 6.41% |
EVSM Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 3.00% | 3.12% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVLN and EVSM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EVLN has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to EVSM (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLN dropped -2.78% vs EVSM's -1.50%.
On 1-year performance, EVLN leads with 4.86% vs 4.06% for EVSM. On fees, EVSM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EVSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVLN has performed better with a 4.86% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVSM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.
EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.00% for EVSM.
EVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while EVSM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EVLN and 0.19% for EVSM.
EVSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVLN and EVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer