PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIM vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIM vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EVIM having a 1.40% return and EVLN slightly lower at 1.37%.


EVIM

1D
0.15%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.93%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVLN

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.73%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVIM vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
1.40%5.85%1.88%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
1.37%5.59%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIM and EVLN is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIM vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVIM
EVIM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVIM vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVIMEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.55

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.76

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

9.01

-0.38

EVIM vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIM and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVIMEVLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.61

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

2.55

-0.97

Drawdowns

EVIM vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIM drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than EVLN's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIM and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIMEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-2.78%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-1.77%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.04%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.22%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.54%

+0.40%

Volatility

EVIM vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) at 0.46%. This indicates that EVIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIMEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.46%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

1.62%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

1.89%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.86%

2.43%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.86%

2.43%

+1.43%

EVIM vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIM vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

EVIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than EVLN's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
3.55%3.58%3.56%0.78%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.92%7.28%6.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIM and EVLN have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVIM has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to EVLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIM dropped -4.23% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, EVIM leads with 8.07% vs 4.86% for EVLN. On fees, EVIM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EVLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVIM has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVIM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.55% for EVIM.

EVIM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EVIM and 0.60% for EVLN.

EVIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIM and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer