PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIBX vs. MDHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVIBX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than MDHVX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EVIBX has outperformed MDHVX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while MDHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.


EVIBX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.34%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
4.94%

MDHVX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
4.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
0.64%8.21%6.57%10.67%-8.16%5.57%4.83%13.30%-2.77%6.03%
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.64%5.38%6.51%9.86%-2.81%4.38%2.92%9.00%-0.13%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIBX and MDHVX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.69

The correlation between EVIBX and MDHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIBX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVIBX
EVIBX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EVIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MDHVX
MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVIBXMDHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.74

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

4.79

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

23.84

-10.74

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the MDHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIBX and MDHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVIBXMDHVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.82

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.66

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

1.35

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.37

-0.36

Drawdowns

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIBX drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than MDHVX's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIBX and MDHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIBXMDHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-18.04%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-1.06%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-2.65%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-6.26%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.06%

-18.04%

-3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.11%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-0.78%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.21%

+0.25%

Volatility

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.49%. This indicates that EVIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIBXMDHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.49%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

1.41%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

1.80%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

2.58%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

3.43%

+1.97%

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIBX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIBX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison

EVIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than MDHVX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
6.10%5.91%5.36%4.59%5.65%5.04%5.69%5.62%6.01%5.53%5.85%6.54%
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.34%5.47%6.01%5.53%4.31%3.80%4.44%4.37%4.33%4.03%4.95%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIBX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVIBX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to MDHVX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIBX dropped -36.79% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.

MDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIBX and MDHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer