PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVFMX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Moderate (50%-70%) RMS Fund (EVFMX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EVFMX
E-Valuator Moderate (50%-70%) RMS Fund
-0.71%15.41%7.57%11.01%-13.31%6.66%15.65%20.16%-9.76%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
-7.42%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFMX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's -7.42% return.


EVFMX

1D
2.38%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
0.99%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
9.91%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*

BWBIX

1D
2.71%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
-7.42%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
10.39%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EVFMX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFMX
EVFMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EVFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EVFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Moderate (50%-70%) RMS Fund (EVFMX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVFMXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.54

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

0.95

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.86

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.29

3.22

+5.07

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFMX and BWBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVFMXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.54

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.14

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.49

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between EVFMX and BWBIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

EVFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than BWBIX's 8.22% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EVFMX
E-Valuator Moderate (50%-70%) RMS Fund
9.25%9.19%0.50%2.52%1.96%21.05%3.39%2.53%9.89%7.05%0.70%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
8.22%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFMX drawdown since its inception was -28.30%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFMX and BWBIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFMXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-39.14%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-12.76%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.62%

-39.14%

+19.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-9.26%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-11.88%

+7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.41%

-1.45%

Volatility

EVFMX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for E-Valuator Moderate (50%-70%) RMS Fund (EVFMX) is 5.06%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that EVFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EVFMXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.39%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

11.38%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

19.94%

-7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

21.19%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

23.31%

-11.58%