EVFAX vs. LFRIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers) and LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, EVFAX returned 4.73%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for LFRIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVFAX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LFRIX.

Performance

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers (EVFAX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVFAX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than LFRIX's 1.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EVFAX having a 4.73% annualized return and LFRIX not far behind at 4.58%.

EVFAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: 4.60%
• 10Y*: 4.73%

LFRIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.62%
• 1Y: 6.46%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 4.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers	0.48%	4.27%	8.64%	11.66%	-3.22%	4.52%	1.76%	8.65%	0.14%	4.80%
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	1.91%	6.30%	8.28%	12.22%	-2.99%	5.48%	-1.47%	7.59%	-0.01%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EVFAX and LFRIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008	0.70

The correlation between EVFAX and LFRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVFAX vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVFAX

EVFAX Risk / Return Rank: 32
EVFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EVFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EVFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EVFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
EVFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

LFRIX

LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers (EVFAX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVFAX	LFRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.68	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	6.22	-3.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	2.10	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	4.18	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.30	15.86	-11.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the LFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVFAX and LFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVFAX	LFRIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	2.68	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.53	1.92	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	1.17	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	1.12	+0.02

Drawdowns

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than LFRIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFAX and LFRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVFAX	LFRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.28%	-27.90%	-12.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.33%	-1.55%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.45%	-2.59%	-0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.75%	-6.23%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.24%	-21.75%	-2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-1.94%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.41%	+0.37%

Volatility

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers (EVFAX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVFAX	LFRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.64%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.92%	1.86%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	2.42%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.03%	2.86%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.42%	3.91%	+0.51%

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVFAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVFAX vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison

EVFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than LFRIX's 6.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class Advisers	7.36%	7.84%	8.66%	6.84%	5.66%	3.18%	4.29%	5.34%	4.86%	4.22%	4.78%	5.03%
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund	6.89%	7.20%	7.68%	7.63%	3.95%	4.01%	4.64%	5.71%	5.60%	4.65%	4.64%	4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVFAX and LFRIX in my portfolio?

EVFAX and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVFAX or LFRIX?

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to EVFAX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFAX dropped -40.28% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.