EVDAX vs. ARBNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVDAX (Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A) and ARBNX (The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional) are both Event Driven funds. Over the past 10 years, EVDAX returned 7.24%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for ARBNX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVDAX charges 2.22%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for ARBNX.

Performance

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) and The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVDAX achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than ARBNX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EVDAX has outperformed ARBNX with an annualized return of 7.24%, while ARBNX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.48% annualized return.

EVDAX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 7.24%

ARBNX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.21%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 6.43%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: 3.10%
• 10Y*: 3.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVDAX Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A	3.02%	9.15%	7.93%	2.28%	3.59%	22.87%	18.83%	7.19%	0.00%	0.00%
ARBNX The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional	1.21%	8.29%	2.95%	6.05%	-0.67%	1.05%	5.71%	3.84%	2.33%	2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EVDAX and ARBNX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2003	0.21

The correlation between EVDAX and ARBNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVDAX vs. ARBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVDAX

EVDAX Risk / Return Rank: 41
EVDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EVDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EVDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EVDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EVDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ARBNX

ARBNX Risk / Return Rank: 97
ARBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ARBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ARBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ARBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ARBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) and The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVDAX	ARBNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	3.56	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	6.35	-4.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.84	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	7.20	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.67	34.43	-23.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the ARBNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVDAX and ARBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVDAX	ARBNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	3.56	-2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.86	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.79	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.58	-0.57

Drawdowns

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVDAX drawdown since its inception was -96.19%, which is greater than ARBNX's maximum drawdown of -14.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVDAX and ARBNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVDAX	ARBNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.19%	-14.42%	-81.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.35%	-0.92%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.19%	-2.24%	-93.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.19%	-7.44%	-88.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.19%	-11.90%	-84.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.67%	-0.07%	-95.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-1.22%	-5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	0.19%	+0.54%

Volatility

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Volatility Comparison

Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional (ARBNX) at 0.29%. This indicates that EVDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVDAX	ARBNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.75%	0.29%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.08%	1.14%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.41%	1.86%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,423.79%	3.63%	+1,420.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,006.99%	4.42%	+1,002.57%

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVDAX has a 2.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ARBNX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVDAX vs. ARBNX - Dividend Comparison

EVDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than ARBNX's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARBNX The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional	3.68%	3.72%	1.18%	2.11%	3.85%	0.51%	6.70%	2.12%	1.93%	3.80%	0.93%	2.30%
EVDAX Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A	0.75%	0.77%	3.99%	6.40%	9.42%	0.00%	1.00%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVDAX and ARBNX in my portfolio?

EVDAX and ARBNX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVDAX or ARBNX?

EVDAX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to ARBNX (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVDAX dropped -96.19% vs ARBNX's -14.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.