PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVDAX vs. BILPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) and BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVDAX achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly higher than BILPX's 3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EVDAX has outperformed BILPX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while BILPX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.19% annualized return.


EVDAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.28%
6M
2.73%
YTD
3.30%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
7.27%
ALL TIME*
3.14%

BILPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
6M
3.37%
YTD
3.08%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
5.19%
ALL TIME*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVDAX
Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A
3.30%9.15%7.93%2.28%3.59%22.87%18.83%7.19%0.00%0.00%
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
3.08%8.43%4.37%5.38%0.01%1.95%6.30%7.29%5.47%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EVDAX and BILPX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.21

The correlation between EVDAX and BILPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVDAX vs. BILPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVDAX
EVDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EVDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EVDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BILPX
BILPX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BILPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BILPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) and BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVDAXBILPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.38

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

12.91

-5.10

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the BILPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVDAX and BILPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVDAX drawdown since its inception was -96.19%, which is greater than BILPX's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVDAX and BILPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVDAXBILPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.19%

-47.50%

-48.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-1.53%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.19%

-3.33%

-92.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.19%

-4.31%

-91.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.19%

-11.58%

-84.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.66%

-0.38%

-95.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-5.48%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.40%

+0.44%

Volatility

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Volatility Comparison

Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A (EVDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund (BILPX) at 1.02%. This indicates that EVDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVDAXBILPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.02%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.24%

2.28%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

2.99%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,424.35%

4.09%

+1,420.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,006.79%

4.64%

+1,002.15%

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVDAX has a 2.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BILPX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVDAX vs. BILPX - Dividend Comparison

EVDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than BILPX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILPX
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Fund
3.29%4.19%4.16%1.99%2.58%2.66%2.97%3.41%1.97%5.12%1.11%74.64%
EVDAX
Camelot Event Driven Fund Class A
0.74%0.77%3.99%6.40%9.42%0.00%1.00%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVDAX and BILPX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVDAX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to BILPX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVDAX dropped -96.19% vs BILPX's -47.50%.

BILPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVDAX and BILPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer