EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L
EVAL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - EVAL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L returned 12.19%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.
Performance
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while MIBX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIBX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has underperformed MIBX.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while MIBX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.22% annualized return.
EVAL.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
MIBX.L
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 17.52%
- 1Y
- 37.96%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- 17.22%
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVAL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF | 11.68% | 41.82% | 4.36% | 11.01% | 1.33% | 19.13% | -2.54% | 16.22% | -13.77% | 15.54% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 16.96% | 43.78% | 13.17% | 30.61% | -3.53% | 18.16% | 1.49% | 25.15% | -12.72% | 21.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVAL.L and MIBX.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EVAL.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Industrials
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Healthcare
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Technology
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Defensive
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Consumer Cyclical
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Basic Materials
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Energy
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Utilities
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Communication Services
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Real Estate
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank
EVAL.L
MIBX.L
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVAL.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.68 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 13.42 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and MIBX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVAL.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -67.93% | +27.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -10.26% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.34% | -15.64% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.61% | -24.06% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.77% | -35.10% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -2.75% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -39.85% | +28.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.82% | -0.08% |
Volatility
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) is 3.18%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that EVAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVAL.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.93% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 12.41% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 15.13% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.95% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 18.93% | -1.11% |
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVAL.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison
EVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVAL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.15% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.73% | 3.88% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVAL.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.
EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.
Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and MIBX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer