PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EVAL.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVAL.L achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EVAL.L has outperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 11.80%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.


EVAL.L

1D
0.67%
1M
4.21%
YTD
11.21%
6M
14.15%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
11.80%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVAL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.21%41.81%4.36%11.02%1.33%19.13%-2.54%16.22%-13.77%15.54%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EVAL.L and LCPE.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, EVAL.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVAL.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

21.5%

-

Industrials

18.0%
0.2%

Healthcare

13.2%
32.6%

Technology

10.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
32.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

6.2%
32.3%

Energy

5.5%
0.0%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

EVAL.L
21.5%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

EVAL.L
18.0%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Healthcare

EVAL.L
13.2%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Technology

EVAL.L
10.6%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

EVAL.L
8.6%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EVAL.L
6.6%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

EVAL.L
6.2%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Energy

EVAL.L
5.5%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Utilities

EVAL.L
5.3%
LCPE.L

-

Communication Services

EVAL.L
4.0%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Real Estate

EVAL.L
0.7%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVAL.L
EVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVAL.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.13

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

13.66

-1.06

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVAL.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVAL.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.44

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.04

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.20

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.98

-0.62

Drawdowns

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVAL.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVAL.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.72%

-27.05%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-6.66%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-12.39%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.61%

-12.39%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.77%

-27.05%

-10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.71%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-3.52%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.02%

+0.71%

Volatility

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (EVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that EVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVAL.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.81%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

8.48%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

11.29%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

17.74%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

20.60%

-3.63%

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVAL.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EVAL.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EVAL.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

EVAL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EVAL.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVAL.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer