EUSB vs. FTBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).
EUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI US Universal Choice ESG Screened Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2020. FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUSB or FTBFX.
Key characteristics
| EUSB | FTBFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.74% | 3.78% |
| 1Y Return | 7.74% | 9.93% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.24% | -1.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.44 | 1.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.12 | 2.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.57 | 0.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.70 | 7.72 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.47% | 1.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.84% | 5.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.86% | -18.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.69% | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUSB and FTBFX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EUSB achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than FTBFX's 3.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
EUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than FTBFX's 4.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.57% | 3.08% | 2.22% | 1.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.59% | 4.15% | 3.34% | 2.19% | 2.53% | 2.95% | 3.19% | 2.74% | 2.95% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSB drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, roughly equal to the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSB and FTBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUSB vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.26%. This indicates that EUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.