EURL vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EURL (Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EURL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, EURL returned 39.22% vs 1565.25% for INTW. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EURL charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

EURL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EURL achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 508.60% return.

EURL

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 22.12%
• 1Y: 39.22%
• 3Y*: 31.90%
• 5Y*: 6.08%
• 10Y*: 8.63%

INTW

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: 9.37%
• YTD: 508.60%
• 6M: 329.73%
• 1Y: 1,565.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EURL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares	12.18%	56.05%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	508.60%	50.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EURL and INTW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.31

EURL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EURL	INTW
Financial Services	23.0%	-
Industrials	19.8%	-
Healthcare	13.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	-
Technology	7.9%	66.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	-
Energy	5.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.8%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

EURL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EURL

EURL Risk / Return Rank: 26
EURL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EURL Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EURL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EURL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EURL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EURL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EURL	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	11.06	-10.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	5.05	-3.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.63	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	32.40	-31.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	76.21	-72.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EURL vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EURL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 11.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EURL and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EURL	INTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	11.06	-10.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	3.15	-3.10

Drawdowns

EURL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EURL drawdown since its inception was -84.65%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EURL and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EURL	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.65%	-60.58%	-24.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.05%	-49.34%	+16.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.00%	-32.68%	+22.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.99%	-30.08%	-6.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.29%	20.98%	-10.69%

Volatility

EURL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares (EURL) is 17.40%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 48.97%. This indicates that EURL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EURL	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.40%	48.97%	-31.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.33%	111.23%	-72.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.18%	143.17%	-96.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.23%	145.28%	-92.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.80%	145.28%	-89.48%

EURL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EURL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EURL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

EURL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EURL Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3x Shares	1.39%	1.50%	3.51%	2.50%	1.80%	0.33%	0.41%	1.17%	3.07%	0.38%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EURL and INTW in my portfolio?

EURL and INTW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EURL or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (48.97%) compared to EURL (17.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EURL dropped -84.65% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, EURL or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1565.25% vs 39.22% for EURL. On fees, EURL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, EURL has been the lower-risk option at 17.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EURL or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1565.25% return vs 39.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EURL or INTW?

EURL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EURL or INTW?

EURL has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between EURL and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for EURL and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.06 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.