EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EUNZ.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility while AXQT.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EUNZ.DE returned 22.13% vs 68.47% for AXQT.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUNZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AXQT.DE.

Performance

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNZ.DE achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than AXQT.DE's 40.98% return.

EUNZ.DE

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 22.13%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 6.20%

AXQT.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 40.98%
• 6M: 43.57%
• 1Y: 68.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	18.69%	-1.85%
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc	40.98%	15.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.78

The correlation between EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNZ.DE

EUNZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EUNZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EUNZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EUNZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EUNZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

AXQT.DE

AXQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AXQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUNZ.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	3.62	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	4.47	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.64	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	6.01	-3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	22.04	-11.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUNZ.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	3.62	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	2.20	-1.85

Drawdowns

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than AXQT.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUNZ.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-18.65%	-11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.50%	-11.49%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-2.23%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-3.07%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	3.14%	-1.01%

Volatility

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) is 4.75%, while AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that EUNZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUNZ.DE	AXQT.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	8.70%	-3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	16.43%	-6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.18%	19.11%	-6.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.41%	20.01%	-8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	20.01%	-6.69%

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AXQT.DE's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUNZ.DE vs. AXQT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNZ.DE nor AXQT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE in my portfolio?

EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EUNZ.DE or AXQT.DE?

On fees, AXQT.DE is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUNZ.DE or AXQT.DE?

AXQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.

What is the main difference between EUNZ.DE and AXQT.DE?

EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility, while AXQT.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EUNZ.DE and 0.27% for AXQT.DE.