PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNU.DE achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than IS0Z.DE's 1.29% return.


EUNU.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
-0.79%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*

IS0Z.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.26%
1Y
0.54%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-2.11%
10Y*
-0.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNU.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.39%-4.02%5.70%4.05%-10.69%4.64%0.21%10.21%4.60%-1.59%
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.29%-1.88%0.75%4.39%-16.12%-0.07%2.03%7.04%1.73%-1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.78

The correlation between EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNU.DE
EUNU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EUNU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0Z.DE
IS0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNU.DEIS0Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.01

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

0.09

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

0.19

-0.86

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNU.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNU.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

0.06

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.34

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.05

+0.18

Drawdowns

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNU.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown of -21.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNU.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-21.02%

+8.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

-2.50%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.28%

-5.11%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

-19.65%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

-15.06%

+7.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-7.48%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.21%

+0.50%

Volatility

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) is 0.95%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that EUNU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNU.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

1.69%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

3.07%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

3.82%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.19%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

5.66%

+0.10%

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNU.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0Z.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNU.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than IS0Z.DE's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNU.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.53%3.21%4.10%4.25%1.55%2.78%2.49%2.47%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.67%2.51%2.30%1.57%0.80%0.47%0.62%0.88%0.90%0.82%0.84%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNU.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNU.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.

EUNU.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond, while IS0Z.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EUNU.DE and 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNU.DE and IS0Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer