EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE
EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) and C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI, while C024.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE returned 9.05%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for C024.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUNN.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for C024.DE.
Performance
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNN.DE achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than C024.DE's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE has outperformed C024.DE with an annualized return of 9.05%, while C024.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
C024.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -10.32% | 10.42% |
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 12.05% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.12% | 3.37% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNN.DE and C024.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EUNN.DE and C024.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNN.DE
C024.DE
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNN.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 5.94 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 18.19 | -7.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNN.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.60 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.03 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.30 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, smaller than the maximum C024.DE drawdown of -49.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNN.DE and C024.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNN.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -49.68% | +21.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -6.78% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -25.82% | +10.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -40.46% | +21.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.55% | -47.10% | +18.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -8.55% | +8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -24.80% | +17.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.22% | +0.64% |
Volatility
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) is 3.16%, while Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that EUNN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C024.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNN.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 5.71% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 11.25% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 15.47% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 22.92% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 24.34% | -8.26% |
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than C024.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUNN.DE vs. C024.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.69% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNN.DE and C024.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for C024.DE.
EUNN.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while C024.DE is China Equities. EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI, while C024.DE tracks MSCI China A. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUNN.DE and 0.25% for C024.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNN.DE and C024.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer