PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than XCTE.DE's 5.61% return.


EUNM.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
3.61%
YTD
27.21%
6M
27.83%
1Y
48.65%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.83%

XCTE.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
1.62%
YTD
5.61%
6M
4.97%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
27.21%19.18%14.09%5.71%-10.99%
XCTE.DE
Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C
5.61%19.05%22.69%-18.15%-7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2022

0.72

The correlation between EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

XCTE.DE
XCTE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCTE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNM.DEXCTE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

1.10

+3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

1.90

+15.17

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the XCTE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNM.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

0.86

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.12

+0.26

Drawdowns

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum XCTE.DE drawdown of -48.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNM.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-48.80%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.46%

-23.30%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-31.31%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-12.95%

+10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-25.74%

+15.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

13.53%

-10.63%

Volatility

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.DE) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNM.DEXCTE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

7.28%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

15.06%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

29.97%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

30.37%

-13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

30.37%

-12.18%

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XCTE.DE's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNM.DE vs. XCTE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNM.DE nor XCTE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for XCTE.DE.

EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XCTE.DE is Technology Equities. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XCTE.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.44% for XCTE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and XCTE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer