PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than SLMG.DE's 0.81% return.


EUNM.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
2.53%
YTD
26.16%
6M
28.73%
1Y
46.27%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.07%

SLMG.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
1.01%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.43%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.16%19.20%14.09%5.71%-14.48%4.68%6.81%6.36%
SLMG.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.81%10.76%3.24%7.20%-21.29%-3.94%3.70%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2019

0.35

The correlation between EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SLMG.DE
SLMG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SLMG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNM.DESLMG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

1.57

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

6.15

+9.12

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the SLMG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than SLMG.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNM.DESLMG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-31.14%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-4.78%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-8.08%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-30.75%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-6.57%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-12.80%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.23%

+1.79%

Volatility

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (SLMG.DE) at 2.19%. This indicates that EUNM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNM.DESLMG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

2.19%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

4.72%

+11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

5.81%

+12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

8.48%

+8.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

10.32%

+7.90%

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMG.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNM.DE vs. SLMG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNM.DE nor SLMG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLMG.DE.

EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SLMG.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while SLMG.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.50% for SLMG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and SLMG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer