PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNM.DE vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNM.DE is traded in EUR, while IEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNM.DE has outperformed IEF with an annualized return of 10.07%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.27% annualized return.


EUNM.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
2.53%
YTD
26.16%
6M
28.73%
1Y
46.27%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.07%

IEF

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.46%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
0.49%
5Y*
-0.34%
10Y*
0.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.16%19.20%14.09%5.71%-14.48%4.68%6.81%20.92%-10.84%19.89%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.07%-4.79%5.92%0.53%-9.90%3.90%0.94%10.47%5.73%-10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNM.DE and IEF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2009

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNM.DE vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNM.DEIEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.11

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.71

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

2.01

+13.26

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNM.DE and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than IEF's maximum drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNM.DEIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-21.59%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-5.08%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-11.07%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-15.81%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-21.59%

-10.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-16.26%

+12.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-9.57%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.78%

+1.24%

Volatility

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 1.02%. This indicates that EUNM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNM.DEIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

1.02%

+6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

4.62%

+11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

6.12%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

9.18%

+7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

8.74%

+9.48%

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNM.DE vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison

EUNM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.89%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNM.DE and IEF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EUNM.DE.

EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IEF is Government Bonds. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IEF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.15% for IEF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer