PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EUNM.DE having a 27.21% return and CBUN.DE slightly higher at 27.45%.


EUNM.DE

1D
-1.60%
1M
3.61%
YTD
27.21%
6M
27.83%
1Y
48.65%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.83%

CBUN.DE

1D
-1.30%
1M
12.33%
YTD
27.45%
6M
25.10%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
29.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
27.21%19.18%14.09%5.71%-8.57%
CBUN.DE
iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.45%9.37%36.98%46.88%-9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022

0.67

The correlation between EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUN.DE
CBUN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CBUN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNM.DECBUN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

1.85

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

4.12

+12.95

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the CBUN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNM.DECBUN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

1.66

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.31

-0.92

Drawdowns

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than CBUN.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNM.DECBUN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-25.59%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.46%

-17.83%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-25.59%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-1.91%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-5.25%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

8.01%

-5.11%

Volatility

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNM.DECBUN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

7.08%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

15.34%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

19.80%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

20.47%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

20.47%

-2.28%

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUN.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNM.DE vs. CBUN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNM.DE nor CBUN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CBUN.DE.

EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CBUN.DE is Technology Equities. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while CBUN.DE tracks STOXX® Global Digital Entertainment and Education. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.40% for CBUN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and CBUN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer