PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNA.DE vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNA.DE is traded in EUR, while WMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WMT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 10.75% return.


EUNA.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
0.41%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*

WMT

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.45%
YTD
10.75%
6M
5.71%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
31.63%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
19.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.20%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%3.86%5.07%-1.20%-0.20%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
10.31%9.72%85.47%9.50%5.70%9.60%13.16%33.10%1.10%-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNA.DE and WMT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNA.DE vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNA.DEWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.83

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

6.33

-4.91

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNA.DE and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNA.DEWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-33.52%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-15.92%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.11%

-25.42%

+21.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-25.42%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-9.50%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-8.44%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

4.60%

-3.59%

Volatility

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) is 1.22%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 10.06%. This indicates that EUNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNA.DEWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

10.06%

-8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

19.19%

-16.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

24.36%

-20.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

22.57%

-17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

22.84%

-18.39%

Dividends

EUNA.DE vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNA.DE and WMT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer