EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE
EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and HGGA.DE (HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - EUNA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged) while HGGA.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUNA.DE returned 2.28%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HGGA.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUNA.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HGGA.DE.
Performance
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than HGGA.DE's 1.31% return.
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 1.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
HGGA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 0.17%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -12.21% |
HGGA.DE HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF | 1.31% | -4.17% | 5.69% | 0.16% | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNA.DE and HGGA.DE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2022 | 0.08 |
The correlation between EUNA.DE and HGGA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNA.DE
HGGA.DE
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNA.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.01 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.08 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 0.17 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNA.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.05 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.04 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than HGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and HGGA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNA.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -8.58% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -2.04% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.02% | -6.78% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -4.56% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -4.18% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.02% | -0.03% |
Volatility
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) at 0.53%. This indicates that EUNA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNA.DE | HGGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 0.53% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 2.33% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 3.42% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 4.98% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 4.98% | -0.71% |
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUNA.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNA.DE nor HGGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNA.DE and HGGA.DE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HGGA.DE.
EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EUNA.DE and 0.18% for HGGA.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and HGGA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer