PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN3.DE achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than HGGA.DE's 1.31% return.


EUN3.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
-2.97%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-1.20%

HGGA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.31%
6M
0.88%
1Y
0.39%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.67%-5.37%2.25%0.44%-11.61%
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
1.31%-4.17%5.69%0.16%-1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2022

0.71

The correlation between EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUN3.DE
EUN3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

HGGA.DE
HGGA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGGA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) and HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUN3.DEHGGA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.01

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.08

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

0.17

-1.54

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the HGGA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUN3.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

0.05

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.04

+0.13

Drawdowns

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN3.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than HGGA.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUN3.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-8.58%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-2.04%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.14%

-6.78%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.83%

-4.56%

-17.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-4.18%

-5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.02%

+1.40%

Volatility

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) at 0.53%. This indicates that EUN3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUN3.DEHGGA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.53%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

2.33%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44%

3.42%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

4.98%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

4.98%

+1.25%

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN3.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HGGA.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUN3.DE vs. HGGA.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUN3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while HGGA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.50%3.09%2.40%1.47%0.79%0.60%1.08%1.20%1.04%1.01%1.04%0.59%
HGGA.DE
HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HGGA.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HGGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUN3.DE.

EUN3.DE tracks FTSE G7 Government Bond, while HGGA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EUN3.DE and 0.18% for HGGA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN3.DE and HGGA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer