PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUN.L is traded in GBp, while LYY4.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYY4.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN.L achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly lower than LYY4.DE's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN.L has underperformed LYY4.DE with an annualized return of 7.22%, while LYY4.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.


EUN.L

1D
0.84%
1M
0.04%
YTD
5.15%
6M
7.47%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
7.22%

LYY4.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.16%
YTD
14.25%
6M
14.44%
1Y
32.59%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS
5.15%20.23%0.23%9.58%1.57%14.92%-3.44%16.69%-12.04%10.12%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
14.25%18.99%7.52%12.45%-5.38%0.56%8.97%14.68%-9.82%15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN.L and LYY4.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.53

The correlation between EUN.L and LYY4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUN.L
EUN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EUN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUN.LLYY4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.00

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

9.65

-4.53

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN.L and LYY4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUN.LLYY4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.81

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.62

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.32

-0.12

Drawdowns

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN.L drawdown since its inception was -47.49%, which is greater than LYY4.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN.L and LYY4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUN.LLYY4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.49%

-42.99%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.58%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-13.95%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.31%

-18.95%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.31%

-25.32%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.11%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-7.69%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.28%

-0.07%

Volatility

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS (EUN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) at 3.11%. This indicates that EUN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYY4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUN.LLYY4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.11%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

14.27%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

17.60%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

15.68%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

16.18%

-1.35%

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LYY4.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUN.L vs. LYY4.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than LYY4.DE's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN.L
iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.88%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUN.L and LYY4.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

EUN.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while LYY4.DE is Japan Equities. EUN.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUN.L and 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN.L and LYY4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer