EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L
EUFM.L (UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - EUFM.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUFM.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUFM.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUFM.L achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
EUFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 6.74% | 29.59% | 3.25% | 15.45% | -7.82% | 13.50% | 8.85% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUFM.L and PRUK.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EUFM.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Technology
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Energy
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
EUFM.L
PRUK.L
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUFM.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.76 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 2.52 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUFM.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.70 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.05 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.38 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUFM.L drawdown since its inception was -30.14%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFM.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUFM.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.14% | -36.10% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -13.05% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -18.00% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -36.10% | +15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -3.76% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -14.80% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.93% | -0.98% |
Volatility
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) is 4.00%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that EUFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUFM.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.82% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 11.72% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 14.14% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 16.54% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.45% | -1.32% |
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUFM.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUFM.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
EUFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUFM.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.
EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for EUFM.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for EUFM.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer