PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUFM.L is traded in GBp, while LDEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFM.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than LDEU.L's 12.58% return.


EUFM.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.26%
6M
6.38%
YTD
8.36%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*

LDEU.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.06%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
8.36%29.59%3.25%15.45%-7.82%7.42%
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
12.58%44.92%9.43%14.43%1.84%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFM.L and LDEU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.76

The correlation between EUFM.L and LDEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (5 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFM.L
EUFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEU.L
LDEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUFM.LLDEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.44

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

12.17

-7.05

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the LDEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFM.L and LDEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFM.L drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, which is greater than LDEU.L's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFM.L and LDEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUFM.LLDEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-17.44%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-7.91%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-13.34%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-17.44%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.06%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.98%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.24%

+0.72%

Volatility

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (LDEU.L) at 3.03%. This indicates that EUFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUFM.LLDEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.03%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

9.62%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

11.78%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

14.58%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

14.42%

+3.96%

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFM.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUFM.L vs. LDEU.L - Dividend Comparison

EUFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEU.L
L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.50%3.47%4.36%4.44%4.17%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUFM.L and LDEU.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.

EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LDEU.L tracks FTSE Developed Europe ex UK All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for EUFM.L and 0.25% for LDEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFM.L and LDEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer