EUDG vs. GQI

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EUDG (WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. EUDG is passively managed, while GQI is actively managed. Over the past year, EUDG returned 22.29% vs 22.47% for GQI. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EUDG charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GQI.

Performance

EUDG vs. GQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDG achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than GQI's 11.98% return.

EUDG

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 3.83%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 8.74%
• ALL TIME*: 6.35%

GQI

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: 10.28%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 1Y: 22.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	$257.59K	$184.23K	$164.35K
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	$1.05M	$1.04M	$2.07M

EUDG vs. GQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	8.49%	28.94%	-4.30%	3.41%
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	11.98%	15.36%	15.99%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDG and GQI is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.56

The correlation between EUDG and GQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUDG vs. GQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUDG	GQI
Industrials	18.1%	8.3%
Healthcare	17.6%	10.9%
Financial Services	15.0%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	11.7%	6.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	10.3%
Energy	3.9%	3.9%
Basic Materials	3.3%	0.7%
Technology	2.7%	37.9%
Utilities	1.6%	0.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.4%

Return for Risk

EUDG vs. GQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EUDG

EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 50
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 87
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EUDG vs. GQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUDG	GQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.30	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.22	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.42	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	3.24	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	16.84	-10.73

EUDG vs. GQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the GQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDG and GQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EUDG vs. GQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDG drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than GQI's maximum drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDG and GQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUDG	GQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-16.56%	-17.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	-6.96%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-1.61%	-6.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	1.34%	+2.32%

Volatility

EUDG vs. GQI - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) at 2.76%. This indicates that EUDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUDG	GQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	2.76%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	7.73%	+5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.36%	9.97%	+5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	13.01%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	13.01%	+4.33%

EUDG vs. GQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GQI's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUDG vs. GQI - Dividend Comparison

EUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GQI's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	2.31%	2.19%	2.41%	2.14%	3.07%	2.98%	1.87%	2.30%	3.00%	1.55%	2.49%	2.10%
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.61%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUDG and GQI in my portfolio?

EUDG and GQI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUDG or GQI?

EUDG has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GQI (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDG dropped -33.76% vs GQI's -16.56%.

Which ETF is better, EUDG or GQI?

On 1-year performance, GQI leads with 22.47% vs 22.29% for EUDG. On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUDG or GQI?

Over the 1-year period, GQI has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 22.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUDG or GQI?

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUDG or GQI?

GQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 2.31% for EUDG.

What is the main difference between EUDG and GQI?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for EUDG and 0.34% for GQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.