EUDG vs. FLSW

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EUDG (WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EUDG tracks the WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index while FLSW tracks the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUDG returned 4.96%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for FLSW. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUDG charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLSW.

Performance

EUDG vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDG achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than FLSW's 5.53% return.

EUDG

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 13.29%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: 8.97%

FLSW

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 4.65%
• 1Y: 16.88%
• 3Y*: 13.34%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDG vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	3.07%	28.94%	-4.30%	19.36%	-18.24%	16.87%	11.29%	28.52%	-13.85%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	5.53%	32.92%	-1.77%	16.79%	-18.14%	20.82%	13.25%	31.66%	-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDG and FLSW is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.84

The correlation between EUDG and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUDG vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUDG	FLSW
Industrials	18.7%	14.1%
Healthcare	17.6%	37.3%
Financial Services	15.0%	17.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	11.7%	13.7%
Communication Services	4.2%	1.2%
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.3%	7.8%
Technology	2.6%	1.3%
Utilities	1.6%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.2%

Return for Risk

EUDG vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDG

EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 26
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FLSW

FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 31
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDG vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUDG	FLSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.09	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.65	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.27	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	4.01	-0.50

EUDG vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDG and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EUDG vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDG drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDG and FLSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUDG	FLSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-28.16%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	-13.38%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	-13.38%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.30%	-28.16%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-2.88%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.70%	-5.95%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	4.21%	-0.42%

Volatility

EUDG vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUDG	FLSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	4.67%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	12.47%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.40%	15.61%	-0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	15.76%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	16.88%	+0.51%

EUDG vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSW's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUDG vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

EUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than FLSW's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDG WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund	2.22%	2.19%	2.41%	2.14%	3.07%	2.98%	1.87%	2.30%	3.00%	1.55%	2.49%	2.10%
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF	0.12%	2.12%	2.04%	2.36%	2.02%	1.86%	2.28%	1.15%	2.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUDG and FLSW in my portfolio?

EUDG and FLSW have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUDG or FLSW?

FLSW has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to EUDG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDG dropped -33.76% vs FLSW's -28.16%.

Which ETF is better, EUDG or FLSW?

On 5-year performance, FLSW leads with 7.21% vs 4.96% for EUDG. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUDG or FLSW?

Over the 5-year period, FLSW has performed better with a 7.21% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUDG or FLSW?

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUDG or FLSW?

EUDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.12% for FLSW.

What is the main difference between EUDG and FLSW?

EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for EUDG and 0.09% for FLSW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.