PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUCO.L vs. IMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUCO.L is traded in EUR, while IMID.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMID.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUCO.L achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than IMID.L's 13.66% return.


EUCO.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.41%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.02%

IMID.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.17%
YTD
13.66%
6M
14.03%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.53%2.91%4.46%7.64%-13.67%-1.21%2.64%6.74%-0.98%
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
13.63%7.66%23.99%18.00%-12.54%26.66%6.56%28.18%-9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EUCO.L and IMID.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018

0.27

The correlation between EUCO.L and IMID.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUCO.L
IMID.L

Financial Services

30.1%
13.0%

Industrials

5.4%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
9.7%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.1%

Healthcare

3.0%
9.6%

Utilities

2.4%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
8.0%

Energy

1.5%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
8.2%

Technology

1.0%
9.6%

Financial Services

EUCO.L
30.1%
IMID.L
13.0%

Industrials

EUCO.L
5.4%
IMID.L
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EUCO.L
5.3%
IMID.L
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

EUCO.L
4.5%
IMID.L
9.7%

Communication Services

EUCO.L
4.3%
IMID.L
3.1%

Healthcare

EUCO.L
3.0%
IMID.L
9.6%

Utilities

EUCO.L
2.4%
IMID.L
3.3%

Real Estate

EUCO.L
2.2%
IMID.L
8.0%

Energy

EUCO.L
1.5%
IMID.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

EUCO.L
1.4%
IMID.L
8.2%

Technology

EUCO.L
1.0%
IMID.L
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUCO.L
EUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IMID.L
IMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUCO.LIMID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

4.43

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

16.60

-14.14

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the IMID.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUCO.L and IMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUCO.LIMID.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.20

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.81

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.57

-0.30

Drawdowns

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -17.53%, smaller than the maximum IMID.L drawdown of -41.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUCO.L and IMID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUCO.LIMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-41.43%

+23.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-6.25%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-20.76%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.53%

-20.76%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.47%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-4.64%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.67%

-0.90%

Volatility

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) is 1.18%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that EUCO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUCO.LIMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

3.48%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

9.45%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19%

12.58%

-9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.52%

14.81%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

20.71%

-16.26%

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUCO.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IMID.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUCO.L vs. IMID.L - Dividend Comparison

EUCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.26%3.25%3.07%2.13%0.96%0.89%0.86%1.38%0.89%1.21%1.36%1.71%
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUCO.L and IMID.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUCO.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUCO.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IMID.L.

EUCO.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while IMID.L is Global Equities. EUCO.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUCO.L and 0.40% for IMID.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUCO.L and IMID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer