EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EUCO.L (SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUCO.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EUCO.L returned 1.02%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for ACWD.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EUCO.L is traded in EUR, while ACWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUCO.L achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EUCO.L has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 1.02%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.

EUCO.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 1.90%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 0.01%
• 10Y*: 1.02%

ACWD.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 6M: 13.32%
• 1Y: 26.82%
• 3Y*: 18.02%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 12.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EUCO.L SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	0.53%	2.91%	4.46%	7.64%	-13.67%	-1.21%	2.64%	6.74%	-1.39%	2.08%
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	12.81%	8.26%	25.53%	18.60%	-13.31%	27.65%	6.35%	28.65%	-5.62%	8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EUCO.L and ACWD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014	0.22

Over the past year, EUCO.L and ACWD.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUCO.L	ACWD.L
Financial Services	30.1%	16.5%
Industrials	5.4%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.3%	9.0%
Healthcare	3.0%	8.0%
Utilities	2.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.7%
Energy	1.5%	4.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	3.6%
Technology	1.0%	29.2%

Return for Risk

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUCO.L

EUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
EUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
EUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
EUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
EUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUCO.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	2.13	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	3.02	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.40	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	4.21	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	15.93	-13.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUCO.L and ACWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUCO.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	2.13	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.83	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.79	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.81	-0.54

Drawdowns

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -17.53%, smaller than the maximum ACWD.L drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUCO.L and ACWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUCO.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.53%	-33.03%	+15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-6.34%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-20.30%	+17.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.53%	-20.30%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.53%	-33.03%	+15.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.55%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-4.40%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	1.68%	-0.91%

Volatility

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) is 1.18%, while SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that EUCO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUCO.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	3.48%	-2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	9.40%	-6.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19%	12.53%	-9.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.52%	14.80%	-10.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.45%	15.72%	-11.27%

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUCO.L and ACWD.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EUCO.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison

EUCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while ACWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUCO.L SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	3.26%	3.25%	3.07%	2.13%	0.96%	0.89%	0.86%	1.38%	0.89%	1.21%	1.36%	1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUCO.L and ACWD.L in my portfolio?

EUCO.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EUCO.L or ACWD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUCO.L or ACWD.L?

EUCO.L and ACWD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

What is the main difference between EUCO.L and ACWD.L?

EUCO.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. EUCO.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index.