ETU vs. USFR
ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. ETU is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, ETU returned -75.56% vs 4.01% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. ETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
ETU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -72.00% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
ETU
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -45.33%
- YTD
- -72.00%
- 6M
- -76.01%
- 1Y
- -75.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
ETU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -72.00% | -62.44% | 50.47% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 4.23% | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETU and USFR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
ETU
USFR
ETU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -50.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 13.37 | -12.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 202.38 | -203.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 783.80 | -785.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 15.01 | -15.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 1.60 | -2.07 |
Drawdowns
ETU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -1.36% | -91.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.69% | -0.02% | -91.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.19% | 0.00% | -93.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.47% | -0.16% | -62.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | 0.01% | +62.33% |
Volatility
ETU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a higher volatility of 20.14% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that ETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETU | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.14% | 0.06% | +20.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.27% | 0.18% | +91.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.32% | 0.27% | +136.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 0.40% | +145.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 0.81% | +144.96% |
ETU vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETU and USFR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETU has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETU dropped -93.19% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 1-year performance, USFR leads with 4.01% vs -75.56% for ETU. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFR has performed better with a 4.01% return vs -75.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.
ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETU and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer