ETU vs. ESK
ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) and ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares, while ESK is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX Shares. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ESK.
Performance
ETU vs. ESK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -72.00% return, which is significantly lower than ESK's -40.40% return.
ETU
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -45.33%
- YTD
- -72.00%
- 6M
- -76.01%
- 1Y
- -75.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESK
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -26.08%
- YTD
- -40.40%
- 6M
- -43.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETU vs. ESK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -72.00% | -52.34% |
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -40.40% | -23.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETU and ESK is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETU vs. ESK — Risk / Return Rank
ETU
ESK
ETU vs. ESK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETU | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETU | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -1.01 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
ETU vs. ESK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than ESK's maximum drawdown of -61.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and ESK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETU | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -61.89% | -31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.19% | -61.89% | -31.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.47% | -40.31% | -22.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | — | — |
Volatility
ETU vs. ESK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETU | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.32% | 67.08% | +69.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 67.08% | +78.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 67.08% | +78.69% |
ETU vs. ESK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ESK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETU vs. ESK - Dividend Comparison
ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ESK's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 0.99% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ETU and ESK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ESK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ETU.
ESK has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.
ETU is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while ESK is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ETU and 0.75% for ESK.
Find the right allocation for ETU and ESK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer