ETU vs. BTCL
ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) and BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ETU returned -75.56% vs -74.96% for BTCL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
ETU vs. BTCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETU achieves a -72.00% return, which is significantly lower than BTCL's -55.71% return.
ETU
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -45.33%
- YTD
- -72.00%
- 6M
- -76.01%
- 1Y
- -75.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCL
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -40.66%
- YTD
- -55.71%
- 6M
- -61.59%
- 1Y
- -74.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETU vs. BTCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | -72.00% | -62.44% | 50.47% |
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -55.71% | -39.52% | 69.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETU and BTCL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ETU and BTCL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETU vs. BTCL — Risk / Return Rank
ETU
BTCL
ETU vs. BTCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) and T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETU | BTCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.83 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.93 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -1.48 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETU | BTCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | -0.86 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -0.28 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ETU vs. BTCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETU drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than BTCL's maximum drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETU and BTCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETU | BTCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -80.75% | -12.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.69% | -80.75% | -10.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.19% | -80.75% | -12.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.47% | -34.25% | -28.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | 50.74% | +11.60% |
Volatility
ETU vs. BTCL - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a higher volatility of 20.14% compared to T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) at 18.49%. This indicates that ETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETU | BTCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.14% | 18.49% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 91.27% | 68.72% | +22.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.32% | 87.41% | +48.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 97.85% | +47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 145.77% | 97.85% | +47.92% |
ETU vs. BTCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ETU and BTCL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
ETU vs. BTCL - Dividend Comparison
ETU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BTCL's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 3.83% | 1.70% | 4.35% |
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETU and BTCL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETU has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to BTCL (18.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETU dropped -93.19% vs BTCL's -80.75%.
On 1-year performance, BTCL leads with -74.96% vs -75.56% for ETU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTCL has been the lower-risk option at 18.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCL has performed better with a -74.96% return vs -75.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETU and BTCL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BTCL has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and REX.
ETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETU and BTCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer