ETTY vs. SCUS
ETTY (Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETTY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ETTY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.
Performance
ETTY vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETTY achieves a -43.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 1.51% return.
ETTY
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -22.31%
- YTD
- -43.72%
- 6M
- -41.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCUS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETTY vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -43.72% | -27.75% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.51% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTY and SCUS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETTY vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank
ETTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCUS
ETTY vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (ETTY) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETTY | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 24.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 104.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETTY vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTY drawdown since its inception was -61.36%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTY and SCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTY | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.36% | -0.17% | -61.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.37% | -0.06% | -59.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.31% | -0.02% | -36.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.04% | — |
Volatility
ETTY vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETTY | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 0.68% | +63.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.27% | 0.71% | +63.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.27% | 0.71% | +63.56% |
ETTY vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETTY vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison
ETTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.18%, more than SCUS's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETTY Amplify Ethereum 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 36.18% | 6.26% | 0.00% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 3.91% | 4.17% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETTY and SCUS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ETTY.
ETTY has the higher dividend yield at 36.18%, compared with 3.91% for SCUS.
ETTY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ETTY and 0.14% for SCUS.
Find the right allocation for ETTY and SCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer