PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETTGX vs. CHAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETTGX achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly lower than CHAIX's 27.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX has underperformed CHAIX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while CHAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.


ETTGX

1D
0.92%
1M
2.37%
6M
6.97%
YTD
8.94%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.74%

CHAIX

1D
1.45%
1M
2.62%
6M
24.37%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
46.43%
3Y*
32.98%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
18.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETTGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund
8.94%16.69%25.16%28.24%-20.11%24.69%23.05%29.32%-5.28%22.35%
CHAIX
Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class
27.21%20.67%38.77%26.00%-20.32%22.36%18.41%41.69%-3.87%24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ETTGX and CHAIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2007

0.91

The correlation between ETTGX and CHAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETTGX vs. CHAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETTGX
ETTGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ETTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ETTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAIX
CHAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETTGXCHAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

4.63

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

18.79

-11.42

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the CHAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETTGX and CHAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, roughly equal to the maximum CHAIX drawdown of -50.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and CHAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETTGXCHAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.02%

-50.61%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-9.86%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-23.40%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.03%

-24.58%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.98%

-30.36%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-10.35%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.43%

-0.02%

Volatility

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) is 4.57%, while Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that ETTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETTGXCHAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

6.59%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

14.66%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

18.60%

-5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

18.79%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

19.10%

-0.78%

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETTGX vs. CHAIX - Dividend Comparison

ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than CHAIX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHAIX
Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class
6.45%8.20%18.32%5.36%5.09%18.78%7.39%21.65%12.33%11.44%8.83%9.93%
ETTGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund
2.73%2.98%2.11%0.58%0.64%0.35%0.62%0.83%0.93%0.88%1.06%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETTGX and CHAIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAIX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to ETTGX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETTGX dropped -52.02% vs CHAIX's -50.61%.

CHAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETTGX and CHAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer