CHAIX vs. LGLAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CHAIX (Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class) and LGLAX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHAIX returned 18.43%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for LGLAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHAIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for LGLAX.

Performance

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A (LGLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAIX achieves a 24.13% return, which is significantly higher than LGLAX's 5.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHAIX having a 18.43% annualized return and LGLAX not far behind at 17.84%.

CHAIX

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 24.13%
• 6M: 21.91%
• 1Y: 45.63%
• 3Y*: 32.95%
• 5Y*: 17.92%
• 10Y*: 18.43%

LGLAX

• 1D: -3.39%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 5.88%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 16.99%
• 3Y*: 25.69%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 17.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHAIX Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class	24.13%	20.67%	38.77%	26.00%	-20.32%	22.36%	18.41%	41.69%	-3.87%	24.73%
LGLAX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A	5.88%	16.20%	44.60%	32.97%	-38.87%	8.32%	77.11%	34.68%	-1.32%	31.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAIX and LGLAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2011	0.90

The correlation between CHAIX and LGLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHAIX vs. LGLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAIX

CHAIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CHAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CHAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CHAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CHAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LGLAX

LGLAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
LGLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
LGLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LGLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LGLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LGLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A (LGLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAIX	LGLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	0.86	+1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	1.25	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.16	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.87	0.92	+3.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.99	2.63	+17.36

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the LGLAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAIX and LGLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAIX drawdown since its inception was -50.61%, which is greater than LGLAX's maximum drawdown of -46.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAIX and LGLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAIX	LGLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.61%	-46.11%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.86%	-21.10%	+11.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.40%	-29.29%	+5.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.58%	-46.11%	+21.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.36%	-46.11%	+15.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-4.05%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-9.42%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	7.37%	-4.97%

Volatility

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class (CHAIX) is 6.91%, while Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A (LGLAX) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that CHAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAIX	LGLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.91%	9.13%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	17.49%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.31%	22.60%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	26.11%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	24.92%	-5.83%

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLAX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAIX vs. LGLAX - Dividend Comparison

CHAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than LGLAX's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHAIX Chase Growth Fund Institutional Class	6.61%	8.20%	18.32%	5.36%	5.09%	18.78%	7.39%	21.65%	12.33%	11.44%	8.83%	9.93%
LGLAX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund Class A	1.99%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	24.88%	9.57%	8.23%	20.27%	6.56%	0.00%	4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAIX and LGLAX in my portfolio?

CHAIX and LGLAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAIX or LGLAX?

LGLAX has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to CHAIX (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAIX dropped -50.61% vs LGLAX's -46.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.