PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETSZ.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMEW.DE's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ETSZ.DE has underperformed AMEW.DE with an annualized return of 9.16%, while AMEW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


ETSZ.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.24%
6M
9.81%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
9.16%

AMEW.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.73%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.75%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETSZ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.24%20.43%8.21%15.61%-10.31%24.89%-1.49%28.86%-11.18%10.63%
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
10.74%7.42%25.77%19.94%-13.88%32.66%5.32%31.10%-5.22%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013

0.82

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETSZ.DE
ETSZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEW.DE
AMEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETSZ.DEAMEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.54

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

13.99

-7.54

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETSZ.DEAMEW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.10

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.83

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Drawdowns

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETSZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than AMEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETSZ.DEAMEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-33.73%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-6.61%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-21.69%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-21.69%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-33.73%

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-0.31%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-4.29%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.67%

+0.84%

Volatility

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) at 2.60%. This indicates that ETSZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETSZ.DEAMEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

2.60%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

7.64%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

11.11%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

14.16%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.03%

+0.51%

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETSZ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEW.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETSZ.DE vs. AMEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETSZ.DE nor AMEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETSZ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETSZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AMEW.DE.

ETSZ.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while AMEW.DE is Global Equities. ETSZ.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while AMEW.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETSZ.DE and 0.38% for AMEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETSZ.DE and AMEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer