ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO
ETSX.TO (Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged) and ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ETSX.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60 while ZEQL.TO tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETSX.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for ZEQL.TO.
Performance
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ETSX.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ETSX.TO Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged | 5.50% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETSX.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ETSX.TO
ZEQL.TO
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged (ETSX.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETSX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETSX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 2.01 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETSX.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETSX.TO and ZEQL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETSX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -6.12% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.58% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -1.69% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETSX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.01% | 12.92% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 12.92% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.71% | 12.92% | -1.21% |
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETSX.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETSX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ETSX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETSX.TO Evolve S&P/TSX 60 Enhanced Yield Fund CAD Unhedged | 9.19% | 9.39% | 9.20% | 9.92% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETSX.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETSX.TO.
ETSX.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60, while ZEQL.TO tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETSX.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ETSX.TO and ZEQL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer