PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETSIX vs. NEFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX) and Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETSIX achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than NEFZX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ETSIX has outperformed NEFZX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while NEFZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return.


ETSIX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.68%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
4.75%

NEFZX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETSIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
2.19%10.88%6.38%8.24%-2.55%1.33%7.52%6.58%-2.68%4.90%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
-0.13%8.92%7.05%8.02%-12.82%3.85%1.15%10.84%-3.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ETSIX and NEFZX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 1998

0.48

Over the past year, ETSIX and NEFZX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETSIX vs. NEFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETSIX
ETSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ETSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ETSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFZX
NEFZX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NEFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX) and Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETSIXNEFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.30

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.63

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

5.50

+9.11

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETSIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is higher than the NEFZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETSIX and NEFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETSIXNEFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59

1.55

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.51

0.42

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.51

0.63

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

1.12

+0.22

Drawdowns

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETSIX drawdown since its inception was -12.63%, smaller than the maximum NEFZX drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETSIX and NEFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETSIXNEFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.63%

-32.07%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-4.17%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.52%

-5.88%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.34%

-17.19%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.28%

-17.21%

+4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.86%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-3.36%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.22%

-0.53%

Volatility

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ETSIX) is 1.06%, while Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund (NEFZX) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that ETSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETSIXNEFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.69%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

3.42%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

4.40%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.21%

5.57%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

5.27%

-2.11%

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETSIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than NEFZX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETSIX vs. NEFZX - Dividend Comparison

ETSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, more than NEFZX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETSIX
Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I
7.10%5.65%6.97%6.93%5.56%4.31%4.19%4.29%3.98%3.70%3.94%4.32%
NEFZX
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund
3.96%3.83%5.60%5.37%6.34%2.64%4.20%3.51%4.28%4.06%4.76%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETSIX and NEFZX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFZX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to ETSIX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETSIX dropped -12.63% vs NEFZX's -32.07%.

ETSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETSIX and NEFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer