ETRL vs. TSDD
ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETRL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
ETRL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's 16.69% return.
ETRL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 26.86%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- -54.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETRL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 1.78% | -51.32% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 16.69% | -56.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETRL and TSDD is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETRL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
ETRL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSDD
ETRL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETRL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETRL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETRL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -99.03% | +22.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -72.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.45% | -98.66% | +48.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.88% | -71.69% | +23.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 56.75% | — |
Volatility
ETRL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETRL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.42% | 87.65% | +14.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 114.18% | -11.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.42% | 114.18% | -11.76% |
ETRL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ETRL and TSDD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
ETRL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
ETRL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.22% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETRL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETRL and TSDD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 0.00% for ETRL.
ETRL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities.
Find the right allocation for ETRL and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer