ETRL vs. NVDL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ETRL (GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETRL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.

Performance

ETRL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETRL achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's -2.11% return.

ETRL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -2.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDL

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: -18.96%
• YTD: -2.11%
• 6M: -4.57%
• 1Y: 27.82%
• 3Y*: 93.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETRL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	1.78%	-51.32%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	-2.11%	10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ETRL and NVDL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

ETRL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETRL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 17
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETRL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF (ETRL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETRL	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.44	—

Drawdowns

ETRL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETRL drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETRL and NVDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRL	NVDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.63%	-67.55%	-9.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-42.23%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.45%	-33.24%	-17.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.88%	-17.10%	-30.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRL	NVDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	26.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	53.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.42%	70.59%	+31.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.42%	90.34%	+12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.42%	90.34%	+12.08%

ETRL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETRL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETRL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETRL nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ETRL GraniteShares 2x Long ETOR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETRL and NVDL in my portfolio?

ETRL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETRL or NVDL?

On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETRL or NVDL?

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ETRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETRL or NVDL?

ETRL and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETRL and NVDL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ETRL and 1.05% for NVDL.