PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETPAX vs. BMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETPAX vs. BMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (ETPAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETPAX vs. BMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ETPAX
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund
-0.44%4.32%2.48%5.30%5.44%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
1.11%7.05%12.65%1.89%-2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETPAX achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than BMN's 1.11% return.


ETPAX

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
1.75%

BMN

1D
0.96%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
1.11%
6M
6.76%
1Y
9.12%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETPAX vs. BMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETPAX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BMN's 0.93% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETPAX vs. BMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETPAX
ETPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ETPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ETPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BMN
BMN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETPAX vs. BMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (ETPAX) and Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETPAXBMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.75

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

1.18

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.36

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.70

3.59

-0.88

ETPAX vs. BMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the BMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETPAX and BMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETPAXBMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.75

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.55

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ETPAX and BMN is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ETPAX vs. BMN - Dividend Comparison

ETPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than BMN's 4.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETPAX
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund
3.73%4.67%4.14%2.79%2.84%2.42%2.86%3.70%3.88%3.79%3.79%3.89%
BMN
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust
4.30%4.30%4.40%4.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ETPAX vs. BMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETPAX drawdown since its inception was -28.69%, which is greater than BMN's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETPAX and BMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETPAXBMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.69%

-13.04%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-5.92%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-4.53%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-2.17%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.24%

-0.38%

Volatility

ETPAX vs. BMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (ETPAX) is 1.27%, while Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that ETPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETPAXBMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

5.73%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

9.49%

-7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

12.24%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

10.52%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.92%

10.52%

-6.60%