PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLX.DE achieves a -17.69% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's -6.38% return.


ETLX.DE

1D
-1.41%
1M
-14.44%
6M
-25.07%
YTD
-17.69%
1Y
45.65%
3Y*
37.92%
5Y*
22.00%
10Y*
11.24%

PPFB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.91%
6M
-11.49%
YTD
-6.38%
1Y
21.76%
3Y*
25.59%
5Y*
17.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ETLX.DE
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-17.69%152.51%27.45%11.01%-7.07%-3.23%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-6.38%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.72

The correlation between ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLX.DE
ETLX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETLX.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.97

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

2.28

+0.65

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLX.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.44%

-22.54%

-50.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.57%

-22.54%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.57%

-22.54%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-22.54%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.57%

-22.54%

-14.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-4.80%

-29.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

9.58%

+6.13%

Volatility

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 6.29%. This indicates that ETLX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLX.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

6.29%

+7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.76%

21.19%

+16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.26%

24.61%

+23.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.80%

16.46%

+20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

16.45%

+17.64%

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLX.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLX.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETLX.DE.

ETLX.DE tracks DAXglobal® Gold Miners, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ETLX.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLX.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer