ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE
ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and CBUG.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap while CBUG.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETLQ.DE returned 18.12%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for CBUG.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLQ.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 18.13% return.
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.95% | 8.12% | 26.14% | 20.86% | -13.64% | 2.27% |
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 18.13% | 6.50% | 13.10% | 11.25% | -14.07% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLQ.DE
CBUG.DE
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETLQ.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 4.63 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 17.68 | -3.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLQ.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -24.57% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -7.24% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.61% | -24.57% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -7.41% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.90% | -0.16% |
Volatility
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) is 3.12%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that ETLQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLQ.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.37% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 10.00% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.44% | 13.98% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 16.66% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 16.66% | -0.90% |
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETLQ.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLQ.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares.
Find the right allocation for ETLQ.DE and CBUG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer